New England Surgical Society
NESS Main Site Current Meeting Home Final Program Past & Future Meetings

Back to 2017 Posters


Is Obesity Urban Body Armor? It is not as Protective as Thought for Abdominal Stab Wounds
*Vivian Hsiao1, *Jacob Sim2, *Asha Zimmerman2, *Andrew Stephen2
1Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI;2Department of Surgery, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI

Objective: To determine effects of obesity on outcomes in abdominal stab wound patients.Design: Retrospective cohortSetting: Level I University-Associated Trauma CenterPatients: Adult trauma patients admitted with abdominal stab wounds.Intervention: NoneMain Outcome Measure: Rates of therapeutic laparotomy, indications for exploratory laparotomy, visceral and solid organ injuries, gastrointestinal resection and repair, mortality, length of stay (LOS), blood transfusions within first 24h, surgical site infection, need for re-operation.Results: A chart review was conducted on 100 patients with abdominal stab wounds in the trauma registry. Twenty-five patients had a BMI≥30. The obese group was older (38.7 vs. 31.2, p=0.018) but the two groups were otherwise similar. Therapeutic laparotomy rates were also similar (non-obese 90.6%, obese 85%; p=0.4). Obesity was associated with longer LOS (9.6d vs. 6.5d; p=0.03). Multivariable logistic regression showed that increasing BMI independently predicts need for GI resection (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.19). No differences were found in other outcome measures.Conclusions: Abdominal stab wounds were associated with longer LOS in obese patients, and increasing BMI was an independent predictor of need for GI resection. Otherwise, obese and non-obese patients have similar outcomes. Contrary to surgical adages, obesity appears non-protective. Future work will require larger sample sizes.

Table 1: Demographics
BMI < 30
n = 75
BMI ≥ 30
n = 25
p
Age31.23 (SD=13.62)38.76 (SD=13.49)0.018
Male67 (89.3)21 (84)0.477
BMI23.85 (SD=3.59)35.5 (SD=5.68)0.000
Non-White45 (60.00)10 (40.00)0.082

Table 2: Complications
BMI < 30
n = 75
BMI ≥ 30
n = 25
p
Exploratory Laparotomy64 (85.33)20 (80.00)0.538
Peritonitis14 (21.88)5 (25.0)0.766
Evisceration19 (26.69)6 (30.00)1.000
Hemodynamic
Instability
9 (14.06)5 (25.0)0.305
Imaging/DPL
Finding
11 (17.19)2 (10.0)0.724
Concerning
Exam
8 (12.50)2 (10.0)1.000
Therapeutic
Laparotomy
58 (90.62)18 (85.0)0.439
Laparoscopy 2 (2.67)0 (0.0)1.000
DPL7 (9.3)0 (0.0)0.187
Positive6 (8.0)0 (0.0)0.332
GU Injury2 (2.7)0 (0.0)1.000
Vascular Injury5 (6.7)1 (4.0)1.000
Diaphragm Injury4 (5.3)1 (4.0)1.000
Solid Organ Injury19 (25.3)7 (28.0)0.792
Spleen Injury6 (8.0)2 (8.0)1.000
Liver Injury12 (16.0)5 (20.00)0.759
Kidney Injury1 (1.3)0 (0.00)1.000
Traumatic Hernia Repair34 (45.3)9 (36.0)0.567
Cholecystectomy1 (1.3)2 (8.0)0.153
Mesenteric, omental appendage repair10 (13.3)2 (8.0)0.725
GI Resection11 (14.7)6 (24.0)0.282
GI Repair30 (40.0)9 (36.0)0.723
Intraoperative Transfusions0.093 (SD=0.49)0 (SD=0.00)0.362
# OR Visits1.10 (SD=0.49)1.35 (SD=1.25)0.171

Table 3: Outcomes

BMI < 30
n = 75
BMI≥30
n = 25
p
Died0 (0.00)1 (4.00)0.082
Blood 1st 24h (units)0.96 (3.43)0.28 (0.74)0.33
Length of Stay6.53 (3.76)9.6 (9.84)0.0257
Surgical Site Infection (SSI)6 (8.00)1 (4.00)0.497
Need for re-operation9 (12.00)3 (12.00)1.000


Back to 2017 Posters