New England Surgical Society
NESS Home NESS Home Past & Future Meetings Past & Future Meetings

Back to 2024 Posters


Pain Management During Bromelain-based Enzymatic Debridement in a U.S. Adult Burn Center
*Martin Buta MD, MBA1, *Dominic Annand BS1, *Sarah Findeisen BA1, *Sean Hickey MD1, *Jonathan Friedstat MD, MPH1, John Schulz MD, PhD1, *Branko Bojovic MD1, *Edward Bittner MD, PhD2, Jeremy Goverman MD1
1Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; 2Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

OBJECTIVE: Outside the United States, bromelain-based enzymatic debridement (BBED) has become an effective tool for removal of burn eschar. BBED can be performed at bedside and allows for complete eschar removal with maximal dermal preservation and markedly reduced blood loss. It may also decrease the need for autografting or the amount of autograft required. A primary concern with BBED is that it is a painful procedure requiring appropriate analgesia. Experience with BBED in the U.S. has been gained through a multicenter phase 3 clinical trial (DETECT) and an expanded access treatment protocol (NEXT). In this retrospective study, we describe our experience using BBED, with particular focus on pain management.
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
SETTING: Tertiary care center.
PATIENTS: Adult burn patients enrolled in the DETECT or NEXT trials who underwent BBED of acute deep partial- and full-thickness thermal burn wounds at a major burn center between November 2016 and July 2022
INTERVENTIONS: BBED of acute deep partial- and full-thickness thermal burn wounds.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics and procedural characteristics, including pain management strategies and Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) scores before, during, and after debridement, were analyzed and described.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients with an average age of 41.2 years (SD=17.8, range 18-72) and an average TBSA of 6.3% (SD=5.6, range 1-24.5) underwent a total of 29 BBED. For pain control during debridement, 6 patients required conscious sedation (CS), 7 a regional block (RB), 5 a local block (LB), and 9 only IV and oral (IVPO) medications. Two patients were intubated and sedated prior to the procedure. No patient required additional BBED treatment and all patients achieved >95% eschar removal. The average NPRS pain score 24 hours before treatment, during treatment, and 24 hours after treatment was 4.0, 4.6, & 4.4, respectively (P=0.65). Sixteen patients (55%) healed without the need for autografting. The average number of days from debridement to wound closure for all patients was 34.9 days (SD=11.9) and for patients who underwent autografting was 40.1 days (SD=12.3).
CONCLUSION: With appropriate analgesia, it is possible to perform BBED of acute deep partial- and full-thickness thermal burns without significant changes in patient-reported pain scores. Prior to debridement, it is critical to establish procedure logistics and reasonable patient expectations.


Back to 2024 Posters