Back to 2025 Abstracts
Drug-Induced Modified Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) are More Potent than Unmodified Extracellular Vesicles In The Preservation of Cardiac Function In The Murine Myocardial Infarction Model
Nicole A. Taylor
*1, Andrea Watters
1, Mahesh Thirunavukkarasu
1, John A. Palesty
2, Nilanjana Maulik
11Department of Surgery, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, CT; 2Stanley J. Dudrick Department of Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, Waterbury, CT
Background: We have previously demonstrated that inhibiting prolyl hydroxylases (PHD1, PHD2, PHD3) led to increased angiogenesis and preserved cardiac function in murine myocardial infarction (MI) and hindlimb ischemia models. Dimethyloxalylglycine (DMOG) is a well-known prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor. Sometimes, drug resistance is a major clinical problem that leads to treatment failure. Therefore, we sought to compare the effect on cardiac function using DMOG versus extracellular vesicles (EVs) isolated from DMOG-treated mice in the murine MI model.
Study Design: Extracellular vesicle isolation: CD1 mice (8-12 weeks old) pre-treated with two doses of either PBS or DMOG (400mg/kg body weight) were subjected to left anterior descending coronary artery ligation (MI) or thoracotomy without coronary artery ligation (Sham). Plasma was collected 8 hours post-MI to isolate EVs from three groups: Sham (shamEVs), MI (MIEVs), and DMOG MI (DMOGMIEVs). All mice underwent preoperative echocardiogram. The mice were divided into six experimental groups for the comparison study: (1) Sham, (2) CMI, (3) DMOG+MI, (4) MI+ShamEVs, (5) MI+MIEVs (6) MI+DMOGMIEVs. In the groups, EVs were administered (4 sites, 25µL each) into the myocardium at the area of risk. Echocardiography was performed 4-weeks after surgery, and cardiac functions were compared between DMOG and DMOG-modified EV treatments.
Results: Echocardiogram demonstrated improved ejection fraction in the MI
DMOGEV group (58.01±4.46,%, n=5) compared to MI
shamEVs (28.81±3.52, %, n=5, p=0.0009), MI
MIEV(23.21±3.07, %, p=0.0002,n=5), and DMOG+MI (43.53±0.68, %, p=0.0124,n=5). The MI
DMOGEV group (30.49±3.03, %, n=5) also demonstrated improved fractional shortening compared to MI
shamEV (13.24±1.86, %,n=5, p=0.0013), MI
MIEV(10.53±1.47, %,p=0.0003, n=5), and DMOG+MI (21.16±0.43, %,p=0.0003, n=5). Also, left ventricular inner diameter at systole was found to be significant in MI
DMOGEV group (2.762±0.2678mm vs 3.685±0.2939 mm, p=0.0252, n=5 ) compared to MI
MIEV group. Stroke volume (38.96±2.502, ?l vs 17.03±2.75?l, p=0.0031, n=5 ) and left ventricular volume at systole (30.43±6.70, ?l vs. 59.83±10.68?l, p=0.0139, n=5 ) also showed similar results in the MI
DMOGEV group compared to MI
MIEV group.
Conclusion: Engineered EVs obtained from mice pre-treated with DMOG before MI demonstrated preserved cardiac function compared to DMOG treatment in MI. Using drug-modified EVs can minimize systemic toxicity and deliver cargo' to the cells in a real-time fashion. This study provides new avenues for developing drug-induced modified EVs as therapeutic strategies in the field of cardiac disease.
Back to 2025 Abstracts