Back to 2017 Program

Objective: Curricular changes to surgical residency, developed to rebalance clinical rotations, optimize education over service, decrease the size of service teams, and integrate apprenticeship-type experiences, were implemented in June 2015. This study quantifies the operative experience before and after implementation as part of a mixed-methods program evaluation. Design: Retrospective review of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case-log data entered by categorical general surgery residents and data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: Quality In-Training Initiative (NSQIP-QITI) pre- and post-intervention at a mid-sized surgical training program. Results: Case logs were reviewed for all categorical residents pre-intervention (2014-15) and post-intervention (2015-16). A total of 11,365 cases, excluding “first-assistant” and “endoscopic” cases were logged for an average of 291 and 263 cases/resident pre- and post-intervention, respectively. The average increased significantly for PGY 3 residents and decreased significantly for PGY 4 residents (table 1). Significant variability was observed between residents at the same PGY level and appeared greatest for PGY 1 and senior (PGY 4, PGY 5) trainees. At the senior level, variability is attributed to resident preference/career choice. When compared to data from QITI, the variability at the PGY 1 level dissipated and was attributed to errors in resident case log behavior. Conclusion: Large variability within PGY level suggests that resident preference may be as influential as curriculum design in dictating operative experience. Statistically significant differences in total average cases/resident for PGY 3/4 trainees were observed and are of uncertain clinical significance.